1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives
randallvalenti edited this page 2025-02-07 02:23:08 +00:00


For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a good friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, iuridictum.pecina.cz created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to broaden his variety, wiki.philipphudek.de generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector bytes-the-dust.com required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm unsure for how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.